In this interview with ARUKAINO UMUKORO,
the National President of the Academic Staff Union of Polytechnics,
Chibuzo Asomugha, says the Federal Government should address the issues
raised by striking lecturers
What is the current state of negotiations with the government and what are your expectations?
I will optimistically describe the
current state of negotiations with government as ongoing. Our
expectation is that government will eventually get round to doing the
needful in order to end this unfortunate impasse.
The Academic Staff Union of Polytechnics has been on strike since October, last year. Why has the strike lasted for this long?
The strike has persisted, in my own
opinion, because the government has failed to keep faith with the union
regarding the 2009 agreement signed between both parties.
Do you think the FG is deliberately undermining the ASUP leadership?
It is my opinion that government’s
insensitivity to the ASUP strike is rooted in the dichotomous mindset
with which government regards polytechnic education. Since the strike is
not the sole decision of the union’s leadership, we are hard put to
interpret government’s attitude as a deliberate ploy to undermine the
union’s leadership.
The Coordinating Minister for
Education, Mr. Nyesom Wike, had reportedly stated that the FG had met
over 80 per cent of ASUP demands. What’s your reaction to this?
We have maintained that the Supervising
Minister of Education has adopted a reductionist strategy in addressing
the grievances of ASUP. Let it be put on record that out of 13 core
issues in our list of demands, government has been able to merely
address two. How that amounts to 80 per cent still befuddles us.
What are the two issues that have been addressed and the others that are yet to be addressed?
Government has completed the constitution
of governing councils of federal polytechnics, even if it came two
years after they were due. Government has also inaugurated the NEEDS
Assessment Committee for public polytechnics. The outstanding issues
include: The removal of the stigmatisation of HND graduates in the
public service; the renegotiation of the 2009 ASUP/FG Agreement; the
release of the white paper of the visitation to federal polytechnics;
the establishment of a National Polytechnics Commission; the speedy
passage of the Federal Polytechnics Review Bill which has been stagnated
at the National Assembly; the appointment of qualified persons as
rectors of polytechnics; addressing the dilapidation in state-owned
polytechnics; addressing the discriminatory inclusion of polytechnics in
the Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information System scheme; a
structured and comprehensive funding of public polytechnics; the
lopsided distribution of Tetfund grants and other interventions in the
tertiary sector; the full implementation of the salary structure
approved for polytechnics in 2009.
Some have alleged that academic
unions embark on strikes for selfish reasons rather than a genuine
concern for students’ welfare and development of tertiary institutions.
What’s your reaction to this criticism?
It is a wild allegation. In my opinion,
this is no longer an issue that should attract our defence. However one
looks at it, trade unions are principally driven by the compelling need
to provide better conditions at work for their members in line with
global best practices. But in contemporary Nigeria, the enduring
academic environment – legal, institutional, policy, capacity,
infrastructure, funding, and so on – has deteriorated to such a
compelling extent that the selfish interests of academic staff has
become subsumed under these other dominant issues. A simple test will be
to look at the 13 issues we have presented for discussion and tell me
which of them are for the selfish interests of academic staff.
Polytechnics are established to
produce graduates with hands on experiences in various fields. But it
seems this is not presently the case in Nigerian polytechnics. Why is
this so?
The objective of polytechnic education at
the outset is clearly spelt out: To produce graduates at professional
levels in technology and engineering, in applied sciences and in
commerce. The emphasis, though, indeed 70 per cent, is supposed to be
dedicated to the sciences, technology and engineering. Unfortunately,
the current trend is that the emphasis is skewed away from science and
technology to commerce. Perhaps, this trend can be traced to such
factors as the need to augment the sparse funding from proprietors as
well as the low supply of candidates for sciences and technology courses
at the admission point. One may also factor in the deplorable state of
infrastructure and equipment in our polytechnics.
What is the solution to the incessant strikes by academic unions in tertiary institutions?
In real terms, it is erroneous to say
that strikes in tertiary institutions are incessant. Indeed, in our own
case, there has been no strike in four years. And never in the history
of ASUP has there been any strike as drawn out as the present
engagement. However, to approach a near ideal state of curbing strikes
in the tertiary sector, government should muster the political will to
take education seriously and make real commitment in terms of funding
and infrastructural input in the system. The legal and institutional
frameworks of the tertiary sector should be strengthened. The government
should also factor in a proactive and sincere approach to the agitation
in the system to curb these grievances at gestation.
How should the government tackle Nigeria’s education woes?
The way our system is presently
structured, government is playing a central role in providing education.
Our level of growth at this time compels the government in power at all
levels of governance to accept responsibility for providing clear-cut
direction in funding, policy, monitoring, quality assurance and
legislation of education. A multi-sectoral synergy will provide the
leverage for a focused and purposeful redirection of the education of
Nigeria’s youth. While the government drives the initiative, the private
sector should also come in with motives that are not entirely
profit-oriented. For a start, we can resolve to dedicate the UNESCO
recommended 26 per cent of the annual budget to education. Yet, we can
do better than that.
What is the way forward in resolving the crisis?
It is our utmost focus in ASUP at this
time to bring this strike to an immediate resolution. In this regard, we
have bent over backward to the point of breaking our back. We still
believe that government must walk the path of integrity and keep its own
part of the bargain. Government must show concern for the pains of
millions of Nigerian students who have been out of school all this whil
No comments:
Post a Comment